TRIALECO
Discuss a pilot
RUEN中文
☰

Trialeco team

Clinical expertise, engineering and accountable governance

The project is led by Artem N. Poltoratskiy as executive and clinical director, with clinical-research, business and SPbPU development teams.

Executive & clinical leadership

Artem N. Poltoratskiy

Project lead and clinical director

Doctor of Medical Sciences and senior physician. Leads clinical logic, safety requirements, automation boundaries and ecosystem strategy.

poltoratskiy.rf ↗
АП

Core team

Roles are based on project materials and public MIKA.help information. Exact Trialeco responsibilities and consent for public attribution require confirmation.

AC

Andrey P. Chicherin

Clinical-trial analytics

Analysis of medical data, research workflows and matching criteria.

TG

Timur G. Gorashchenko

IT development

Digital tools for automating matching and support workflows.

EM

Elena Morozova

Managing partner

Partnerships, business processes and project management; PhD in Philosophy.

Published MIKA.help team page↗

SPbPU development team

Private specifications dated 17 March 2026 identify Peter the Great St Petersburg Polytechnic University as the contractor and the following specialists as developer representatives. Public participation and scope of work require documentary confirmation.

EP

Ekaterina I. Pchitskaya

Laboratory head

Head of the SPbPU Laboratory for Biomedical Image and Data Analysis; Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences.

VC

Vyacheslav S. Chukanov

Research scientist

Laboratory research scientist working with biomedical data and AI methods; Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences.

AS

Alexander S. Sachuk

Software engineer

Software engineer at the SPbPU Laboratory for Biomedical Image and Data Analysis.

Official SPbPU laboratory page↗
GOVERNANCE

Clinical & regulatory governance

  1. 01Clinical requirements are approved by an accountable medical leader.
  2. 02A critical transition cannot proceed without an authorised person.
  3. 03Pilot admission requires a defined workflow, reference set, acceptance criteria and stop conditions.
  4. 04Regulatory and validation status is disclosed per module.

Team membership, titles, institutional status and consent for public attribution require documentary confirmation and regular review. An advisory board will be shown only with participant consent.